help wanted: Catholic apologists
#41
(01-24-2012, 01:20 PM)Tapatio Wrote:
(01-24-2012, 08:59 AM)Vox Clamantis Wrote:
(01-22-2012, 04:49 PM)TrentCath Wrote: Also a Cardinal debating a sodomite? Really?  ???

I can't say I would even have agreed to the debate
How do you know what Fry does in bed?
Fry himself.
http://jezebel.com/5678291/the-fallout-o...l-insights
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr...gay-rights

This guy is clearly in a lower than "gay" or "homosexual".
Due to the risk of being banned, I will not use the correct terminology that describes this man of same sex orientation (and not just orientation).

Thanks, glad I wasn't wrong  :Hmm:
Reply
#42
(01-24-2012, 01:20 PM)Tapatio Wrote: This guy is clearly in a lower than "gay" or "homosexual".

Fry was being honest in his tweet in a coarse kind of way that, like it or not, reflects a degree of worldly knowledge.

It was really hilarious reading how the feminists were by turns castigating him and retracting their castigations, attempting to qualify their approach to sex as "liberated" but not predatory, au courant, but not trampy.  My favorite was the juxtaposition of one feminist's assertion that she has engaged in trysts in the park (remind me to avoid the Serpentine in future) with the protestation that women find "intimacy" exciting.  Then, there was the touching observation that women don't need to frequent public restrooms because they have recourse to the civilized environs of the singles bar.  Ah, the modern woman's dilemma:  how to find lasting romance in a $20 a night room?

And they say Catholics have warped views about human sexuality!     
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)