The real St. Francis of Assisi
#72
(01-31-2012, 01:43 AM)Iolanthe Wrote:
(01-31-2012, 01:37 AM)The Dying Flutchman Wrote:
(01-31-2012, 01:09 AM)Ineffable1 Wrote:
(01-30-2012, 10:04 PM)Iolanthe Wrote: Who stood by Our Lord's side during the passion? Oh yeah--women did, because they were loyal and compassionate instead of being scandalized by what looked (to the apostles) like He had lost the battle.

At the risk of going off on a tangent, I cannot let this ridiculous statement stand, because it is repeated ad nauseum by women. There were a simple reason why most of the men scattered and the women were at the cross. The men were known to be His disciples, taught and trained by Him. As such they would have been considered almost equally dangerous as Jesus Himself as possible leaders of an anti-Roman revolt. That put them at the same risk of crucifixion. The women, being women, were in no such danger. John was probably considered equally safe and non-threatening by virtue of still being a young man (probably in his late teens or very early twenties) at the time.

Now now don't let facts get in the way of a favorite sacred cow of the Catholic feminists.

Uh, a very traditional priest I've known my whole life has always talked about this incident exactly how I just described it. And even if it's true that the apostles scattered because they were afraid of being killed, they still failed to at least try to defend Our Lord. And I seriously doubt St. John was exempt for the reason you mention because he would have been just as well known as the others and it isn't as though he was a child.

And Dutchman, how dare you call me a feminist?

Couple things....
1) No one is calling you a feminist, but you've got to admit that tone can say a lot.  What you wrote is forceful, sarcastic, and sounds like "woman in this situation were better than the men."  I'm not accusing you of being a feminist, just saying you might want to watch how you convey things if you don't want to come across a certain way. 
2) However you meant it, thats just your interpretation of what happened.  Whether or not you are repeating what a Priest has told you still only means that its an interpretation. 
3) I agree with both of you.  The women WERE loyal and compassionate and the men weren't there BECAUSE they were scared and in hiding.  They were well known to be followers of Christ and presented a possible threat to the Romans, therefore putting them at risk for arrest and crucifixion. Again, just my interpretation.     
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Norbert - 01-30-2012, 05:07 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 05:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 05:52 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 06:00 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 06:12 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by knittycat - 01-30-2012, 06:23 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 06:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 06:37 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 06:55 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 07:20 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 07:21 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 07:36 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by knittycat - 01-30-2012, 07:38 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 07:38 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by knittycat - 01-30-2012, 07:39 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 08:09 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 09:01 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 09:14 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by knittycat - 01-30-2012, 09:21 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 09:25 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 09:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by knittycat - 01-30-2012, 09:33 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 09:33 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 09:37 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 09:39 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 09:45 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 09:52 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 09:53 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-30-2012, 10:04 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 10:08 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-30-2012, 10:36 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 10:45 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 10:57 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 11:02 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 11:05 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-30-2012, 11:19 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-31-2012, 01:43 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-31-2012, 02:05 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 01-31-2012, 11:56 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Warrenton - 01-31-2012, 12:08 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Tim - 01-31-2012, 12:56 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Warrenton - 01-31-2012, 01:20 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Tim - 01-31-2012, 02:16 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 02:23 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 02:57 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-31-2012, 03:01 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-31-2012, 03:03 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-31-2012, 03:08 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 03:12 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-31-2012, 03:19 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 03:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Richard C - 01-31-2012, 03:37 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 03:49 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Tim - 01-31-2012, 06:10 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 01-31-2012, 07:20 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 01-31-2012, 08:22 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-31-2012, 08:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 01-31-2012, 09:57 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 01-31-2012, 11:12 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 12:22 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 01:31 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 03:29 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 03:39 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 05:20 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 08:41 AM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 12:41 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Warrenton - 02-01-2012, 01:43 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 02:19 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 02-01-2012, 02:31 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 02-01-2012, 02:45 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 03:00 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by SCG - 02-01-2012, 03:05 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 03:27 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 03:37 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 04:02 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Tim - 02-01-2012, 04:06 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:10 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:12 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:15 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 04:24 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:26 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 04:33 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 04:35 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 04:51 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 05:08 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 05:17 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 05:22 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 05:27 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 05:38 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 05:55 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 07:05 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 07:11 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 07:25 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Iolanthe - 02-01-2012, 07:29 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 07:30 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by Guardian - 02-01-2012, 07:33 PM
Re: The real St. Francis of Assisi - by JayneK - 02-01-2012, 07:36 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)