WHO do you blame more for the post-Vatican II issues - John XXIII or Paul VI?
#1
John XXIII is innocent because................he didn't finish the council - actually, he had very little to do with it as he died early on, so he may not have changed things so much.

John XXIII is guilty because................he started the whole council in the first place. It was totally his idea. And maybe if he lived, he would have made bigger changes than we could ever have imagined....

Paul VI is innocent because................the council wasn't his idea, and he would never have started it to begin with - thus things would never have changed at all.

Paul VI is guilty because...........he was the one who oversaw the majority of the council and approved the changes, and if he wanted, he could have never started the council back up after John XXIII's death.

What do you think?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
WHO do you blame more for the post-Vatican II issues - John XXIII or Paul VI? - by SaintAndrew - 01-31-2012, 11:32 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)