In one sentence Pope Paul VI shows VII to be problematic...
(04-02-2012, 03:16 PM)Crusader_Philly Wrote:
(04-02-2012, 02:02 PM)Mithrandylan Wrote:
(04-02-2012, 02:00 PM)ZekarjaSG Wrote: I understood it to mean that the Eucharist was of lesser importance compared to the Scripture which is of greatest importance in the Liturgy. I believe that, in the Liturgy, the Eucharist is of the greatest importance.

I must have misunderstood what was meant by that. Please forgive me. :(

Don't worry.  It's not like you can actually read that quote and make heads or tails of it anyways.  Could mean one thing, could mean another thing-- thus is modernism.

This can be problematic, for we have people like Fr. Brian Harrison who try to interpret it as best as possible, yet is this the manner in which its authors intended it to be understood?  ???

Compare the latest encyclicals with pre-VII stuff, and the difference in clarity is amazing.

That's what I'm saying.  I'm telling the OP not to worry about "mis-interpreted" because it's set up that way.  Ambiguity, the mark of the council, the banner of modernism.
More Catholic Discussion:

Go thy ways, old Jack;
die when thou wilt, if manhood, good manhood, be
not forgot upon the face of the earth, then am I a
shotten herring. There live not three good men
unhanged in England; and one of them is fat and
grows old: God help the while! a bad world, I say.
I would I were a weaver; I could sing psalms or any
thing. A plague of all cowards, I say still.

Messages In This Thread
Re: In one sentence Pope Paul VI shows VII to be problematic... - by Mithrandylan - 04-02-2012, 03:25 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)