SSPX Deal: But Will the Fat Lady Sing? — article by Fr. Cekada
#42
(04-20-2012, 04:06 PM)FatherCekada Wrote: Since in the event of a deal with the Vatican, SSPX would have to conform to the principles of Canon Law, Benedict XVI and his successors would indeed have the ultimate authority over SSPX property. The SSPX Superior General and officials of his General Council sit on the various U.S. corporations ex officio, and B16 and his successors could indeed appoint others to in their place at any time whatsover.

Under "deference," US courts would recognize this, and send any potential Fr. Cekadas packing posthaste.

So, they would be Catholic rather than Conregationalists?  And schismatics trying to steal property wouldn't be able to?  And this is bad somehow?  ???

Quote:Finally, Archbishop Lefebvre blew up at us and expelled us from SSPX on April 27, 1983, precisely at the point when we proposed that the civil legal documents for corporations holding church property in the U.S. be amended to incorporate language perpetually barring the use of the reformed rites and the presence of invalidly ordained clergy.

We proposed this precisely because we suspected that he or his SSPX would one day sell out.

Well guess what.....

Well, what do you care about the property of a bunch of sell-outs anyway?  :LOL:
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: SSPX Deal: But Will the Fat Lady Sing? — article by Fr. Cekada - by Parmandur - 04-20-2012, 04:26 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)