SSPX Deal: But Will the Fat Lady Sing? — article by Fr. Cekada

Maybe this will clarify the question of why I think that, in the event of any SSPX deal, the Benedict XVI and his successors would have the ultimate authority over the SSPX property (in the U.S., at least)
(04-22-2012, 12:08 AM)DJR Wrote: A court will not "automatically" award control of a property to anyone.  It must first discern the rightful owner, and that is determined by a properly recorded deed.

This is correct.
(04-22-2012, 12:08 AM)DJR Wrote: Once the named person/entity is determined, the question becomes:  Who exactly is that person/entity?  That's where some of your later comments come into play.

I will state in your defense that some of your later comments do contain accurate representations of law, but you make a lot of assumptions that may or may not play out.  If some of your assumptions are not correct, then the conclusions that you draw from those assumptions are not correct.

The passage in bold is also the correct question.

Here, the issue I have raised turns on another question: Who controls the non-profit corporations (NPCs) that hold title to SSPX properties in the U.S.?

I think the answer is simple: the religious organization we all know as the Society of St. Pius X controls the NPCs. The religious organization exists also as a recognized civil entity in Switzerland, founded under the name of "Fraternity of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary, a.k.a. the Society of St. Pius X."

It controls the NPCs through corporate directors who obtain and retain their directorships "ex officio" —  solely in virtue of holding certain offices in the Society of St. Pius X.

Thus the Bylaws of any SSPX NPC holding title to an SSPX chapel property in the U.S. probably specify something like:
Quote:1. Appointment of Directors: The following shall ex officio serve as directors of this corporation:

• The Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)
• The First Assistant of SSPX
• The Second Assistant of SSPX
• The Econome General of SSPX
• The US District Superior of SSPX
• The SSPX priest designated by SSPX as Pastor of the chapel.
•The layman designated by SSPX to serve as Lay Coordinator of the chapel

2. Term of Office The term of office for each Director of this corporation shall be coterminous with his holding the corresponding office in the SSPX that has designated under "Appointment of Directors."

Accordingly, since a pope would have the power to replace the Superior General of a religious institute at will (and indeed, all subordinate office-holders as well), Benedict XVI and his successors could remove Bp. Fellay and all the higher SSPX officials from their positions as office-holders in SSPX as a religious organization, and thus at the same time remove them as Directors of the civil corporations (NPCs) that hold title to SSPX properties in the U.S.

So, if SSPX were to be canonically integrated into the Conciliar Church, any future resistance to new Vatican demands or policy changes would ultimately be futile. SSPX Superiors would have to enforce the demands, or be removed from office, as Fr. Bissig FSSP was. And civll control of the corporations holding title to SSPX chapels and institutions would be vested in new and more pliant officials the Vatican would appoint

It would put those who resisted the modernist demands in the same place that faithful Catholics in the '60s found themselves: Out in the street.


Messages In This Thread
Re: SSPX Deal: But Will the Fat Lady Sing? — article by Fr. Cekada - by FatherCekada - 04-23-2012, 12:43 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)