ORthodox perspective of Traditionalist Catholics
(05-14-2012, 02:44 PM)Crusader_Philly Wrote:
(05-14-2012, 02:37 PM)Parmandur Wrote:
(05-14-2012, 02:30 PM)Crusader_Philly Wrote:
(05-14-2012, 01:03 PM)Silouan Wrote:
(05-14-2012, 12:40 AM)Crusader_Philly Wrote: I would also like to say that any kind of attacks against Catholic doctrine, even if very implicit via criticism of the concilliar popes and teachings, should not be allowed on this forum, for it is a Roman Catholic forum.

Then you have to shut down most SSPX discussion as they have a lot of criticism for conciliar popes and teachings.

Like I said, they are wrong for the right reasons, you're right for the wrong reasons. I co wider the SSPX position to be illogical, but at they err in good faith trying to be faithful to true Roman Catholicism. You are criticizing SSPXers and those who criticize post concilliar novelties, scandals, and heresies not because of concern for Roman Catholic truth, but to ultimately serve your Eastern schismatic agenda.

P.S. please take none of this personally, Silouan. I sincerely hope you abandon schism and heresy and enter into the Roman Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, outside of which there is no salvation. I only tell you this in fraternal charity and concern.

I'm sorry, it is not clear to me what makes a Western schismatic agenda preferable to an Eastern schismatic agenda?  ???

Because one is objectively schismatic and heretical. The SSPX position is erroneous, but it is a legal folly. As you should know, I consider it the same as one who "steals" his own umbrella unknowingly.

I know you are raising good points, but my oh my the neo-con assault against the SSPX has reached a peak on fisheaters.

I would also like to point out that whilst the SSPX position is erroneous, it is not schismatic. No way that it's schismatic.

Messages In This Thread
Re: ORthodox perspective of Traditionalist Catholics - by Crusader_Philly - 05-14-2012, 04:21 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)