IF the SSPX become regularized...?
#11
Apparently,if you do not practice popolotry and believe everything the Pope says or does is Immaculate, you are: "neo-nazi, schismatic, socialist, sede, conspiracy obsessed loons." Yikes Socialists!!!!!
Reply
#12
hello?!?! If the Vatican does try some moves on the SSPX then they will just continue like the have for over the past 40 years?!! obviously. +Fellay isn't going to compromise just because the Vatican asks him to. Thats what the whole disagreement is all about! Moral obligation doesn't lie to delegated authority of itself, but to Truth-- that Truth which the SSPX will not trade for unity.. the regularization is not to become part of the Church-- they are already part of it! It is merely to make the frontlines more clear and force the modernists to face the conclusive evidence of its errors. The supreme law of the Church is the Salvation of Souls and the Glory of God... +Fellay will make the decision which does just that. 
Reply
#13
(05-12-2012, 08:20 PM)Parmandur Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 07:19 PM)PeterII Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 06:15 PM)Thomas58 Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 05:55 PM)MorganHiver Wrote: Will this cause a split from both the truly renegade side of SSPX and the neo-caths of Rome? It seems like the only concerns here are SSPX losing their *hard-liners*, but no one has mentioned what would happen to the modernists that forced the SSPX to form, and are now forcing the SSPX to realign themselves with Rome. Do you think that the prot-caths will finally open up the catechism and at least question their *potential* errors?

This is a victory for the Modernists and a damaging blow to Tradition. There will be no split in the Conciliar religion among the Modernists. Doctrine means nothing to them (and apparently it means nothing to Fellay either). It is always in a state of evolution anyway. The SSPX will be just one more choice under the big tent Novus Ordo. The split, if it occurs will be among the SSPX. Hopefully it will be big. Hopefully the other 3 bishops will not be a part of the Fellay sell out.

The Modernists are already dead.  They have not produced any vocations.  It is just a matter of time before the remaining zombies are no longer animate.  This is why Bishop Fellay was hoping for a prolonged status quo - the modernist self destruction is inevitable. 

There will not be a big split.  The minorty of neo-nazi, schismatic, socialist, sede, conspiracy obsessed loons will be purged, and that's a good thing. 

Huh?

Socialism?  In the SSPX?  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?  Dunce

I have a stack of books from dubious publishers bought in SSPX bookstores that promote crank economics.  There are those promoting a Catholic Worker agenda. 
Reply
#14
(05-12-2012, 09:57 PM)PeterII Wrote: I have a stack of books from dubious publishers bought in SSPX bookstores that promote crank economics. 

The SSPX promotes Austrian economics!?
Reply
#15
(05-12-2012, 09:58 PM)Crusading Philologist Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 09:57 PM)PeterII Wrote: I have a stack of books from dubious publishers bought in SSPX bookstores that promote crank economics. 

The SSPX promotes Austrian economics!?

I wouldn't think so considering Chris Ferrara's book.
Reply
#16
(05-12-2012, 06:14 PM)Josué Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 06:06 PM)PeterII Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 05:55 PM)MorganHiver Wrote: Will this cause a split from both the truly renegade side of SSPX and the neo-caths of Rome? It seems like the only concerns here are SSPX losing their *hard-liners*, but no one has mentioned what would happen to the modernists that forced the SSPX to form, and are now forcing the SSPX to realign themselves with Rome. Do you think that the prot-caths will finally open up the catechism and at least question their *potential* errors?

That would be ideal. The Church would only benefit from a de-weeding of true schismatics and true modernists. 

I dunno about that.  There are those feminist catholic "priests" that think that if they "stay" in the Church than they'll have things changed.  I believe we'll have more fights

Fortunately, those old fat lesbians with short haircuts don't reproduce well.  Trads on the other hand have lots of kids.  The worst of the modernist theologians and the generation they influenced are dead or dying off. 

Behold the dreaded enemy:
[Image: CTA-booth-2011.jpg]

....



Reply
#17
hahaha whaaaaat? I didn't think old women like that WOULD be ordained. That means that they must've been dykes since the 40s and out and proud. Definitely a stomach churner, that is.
Reply
#18
(05-13-2012, 01:06 AM)MorganHiver Wrote: hahaha whaaaaat? I didn't think old women like that WOULD be ordained. That means that they must've been dykes since the 40s and out and proud. Definitely a stomach churner, that is.

These women were probably born in the 40's and 50's.
Reply
#19
I know they aren't that old, but they sure are surprisingly old to be so gay.
Reply
#20
(05-12-2012, 09:58 PM)Crusading Philologist Wrote:
(05-12-2012, 09:57 PM)PeterII Wrote: I have a stack of books from dubious publishers bought in SSPX bookstores that promote crank economics. 

The SSPX promotes Austrian economics!?

ROFL Tip o' the hat
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)