Reparation is called for another Anti-Jesus and Mary blasphemy
#23
(06-23-2012, 02:29 PM)jonbhorton Wrote:
(06-23-2012, 03:21 AM)jovan66102 Wrote:
(06-22-2012, 01:03 PM)Resurrexi Wrote:
(06-21-2012, 09:30 PM)Vincentius Wrote: Verhoeven’s take on the life of Jesus Christ discounts all of the miracles that inform the New Testament. That includes the immaculate conception (refers to the Incarnation, not Mary's), and the resurrection. Verhoeven doesn’t believe any of them happened.

The Immaculate Conception always and only properly refers to Mary's being conceived without original sin.

What you're thinking of is the Virgin Birth.

I think Vincentius was making that point. As C.S. Lewis pointed out, to the uneducated non-Catholic, the Immaculate Conception ' always and only' refers to the Virgin Birth of Christ.


I love when people present that understanding to me. It's amazing how many crumble at logic when you are able to bring the concept to their level, especially using science (which recently proved the relationship between the doctrine of the Eucharist and the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary). I'm currently writing a piece which shows the perfection of integration with all Catholic doctrine as opposed to the Protestant, et al view.

What?... and how?   ???
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Reparation is called for another Anti-Jesus and Mary blasphemy - by Might_4_Right - 06-23-2012, 02:38 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)