Priest Starts New Traditional Forum
#1
Priest Starts A New Traditional Forum

For those of you who might be interested, Fr. Dominic has just started a new traditional forum called Ecclesia Militans.
From what I have seen of it, it looks interesting, not many members yet, but it's only a few days old.

[Image: 23.jpg]

Ecclesia Militans Site http://ecclesiamilitans.activeboard.com/
Reply
#2
"Fr. Dominic" is a moniker for Fr. Marshall Roberts who used to be a SSPX but is now an independent priest working with the SSPX in Florida. I am not sure why you would just post Fr. May's picture without checking your sources.

I would strongly suggest removing Fr. May's picture since SSPX priests are not allowed to have blogs or websites.
Reply
#3
(06-23-2012, 08:36 PM)obscurus Wrote: "Fr. Dominic" is a moniker for Fr. Marshall Roberts who used to be a SSPX but is now an independent priest working with the SSPX in Florida. I am not sure why you would just post Fr. May's picture without checking your sources.

I would strongly suggest removing Fr. May's picture since SSPX priests are not allowed to have blogs or websites.

Thank you!  I was afraid I might have been mistaken. Duly removed, my apologies.
Reply
#4
I joined.  We'll see how it goes.
More Catholic Discussion: http://thetradforum.com/

Go thy ways, old Jack;
die when thou wilt, if manhood, good manhood, be
not forgot upon the face of the earth, then am I a
shotten herring. There live not three good men
unhanged in England; and one of them is fat and
grows old: God help the while! a bad world, I say.
I would I were a weaver; I could sing psalms or any
thing. A plague of all cowards, I say still.
Reply
#5
Interesting.
Reply
#6
Terrible format. The photo is very distracting and takes away from the text. Well, at least he recognizes the validity of the Pope.
Reply
#7
The independent priests are very used to using the internet to lure in people, the FSSP and the ICK both should have a chatroom on the internet
Reply
#8
(06-23-2012, 09:38 PM)MorganHiver Wrote: Terrible format. The photo is very distracting and takes away from the text. Well, at least he recognizes the validity of the Pope.

Yes, you can only use the top half of your monitor to read stuff.

More Catholic Discussion: http://thetradforum.com/

Go thy ways, old Jack;
die when thou wilt, if manhood, good manhood, be
not forgot upon the face of the earth, then am I a
shotten herring. There live not three good men
unhanged in England; and one of them is fat and
grows old: God help the while! a bad world, I say.
I would I were a weaver; I could sing psalms or any
thing. A plague of all cowards, I say still.
Reply
#9
(06-23-2012, 08:36 PM)obscurus Wrote: "Fr. Dominic" is a moniker for Fr. Marshall Roberts who used to be a SSPX but is now an independent priest working with the SSPX in Florida. I am not sure why you would just post Fr. May's picture without checking your sources.

I would strongly suggest removing Fr. May's picture since SSPX priests are not allowed to have blogs or websites.

This Father Roberts?

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/060703\
http://www.newengelpublishing.com/pages/...-John.html
Reply
#10
(06-23-2012, 11:19 PM)Scriptorium Wrote:
(06-23-2012, 08:36 PM)obscurus Wrote: "Fr. Dominic" is a moniker for Fr. Marshall Roberts who used to be a SSPX but is now an independent priest working with the SSPX in Florida. I am not sure why you would just post Fr. May's picture without checking your sources.

I would strongly suggest removing Fr. May's picture since SSPX priests are not allowed to have blogs or websites.

This Father Roberts?

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/060703\
http://www.newengelpublishing.com/pages/...-John.html

This needs to be verified or ruled out as a possibility before that forum takes off.

When people get on a new forum that starts taking off, some can be vulnerable to the simple fun of being "one of the first". And, some people resist like mad any attempt to get them to think twice about something they merely "like". If it really is the same Fr. Roberts as in the article, and if that Fr. Roberts was guilty, I'm going to go out on a limb and say he would love to have some core group of early-adopters to defend him. Doesn't sound so likely that people would become so attached and remain so even after such a situation were exposed, but stranger things have happened.

I wouldn't be surprised if such a priest were to choose a time of uncertainty and worry among traditionalists to seek a position from which to cause confusion and trouble and gather information by interaction.

Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)