Card. Kasper, VII Documents-Admits to intentional compromise
#11
(04-15-2013, 08:03 PM)TS Aquinas Wrote: Another at http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=776286


That'll get silenced real fast, the posters are using the forbidden L word. Lefebvre !

Probably so.  I tried to make my thread as non confrontational as I could but still get my point across.  That is par for the course there for how one has to handle these sorts of situations.

Reply
#12
And so, we now have our first "yes the council documents were written more ambiguously than others, but this was a good thing" comment.  Awesome. 

Reply
#13
Did you post in Back fence intentionally ?
Reply
#14
One poster is praising the Reformation and Great Schism.
Reply
#15
(04-15-2013, 09:19 PM)Whitey Wrote: Did you post in Back fence intentionally ?

Yep.  I didn't think it was a good fit for TC forum and since it wasn't really a news report, I didn't know where else to put it.  People seem to find things regardless of where they end up.  Since the Back Fence is supposed to be "Topics of a more serious nature that don't belong in another forum" that has become my go to spot when I something doesn't seem to really fit anywhere else.   
Reply
#16
(04-15-2013, 09:25 PM)Whitey Wrote: One poster is praising the Reformation and Great Schism.

Yep, and quoting things without citing them, which is always nice. 
Reply
#17
(04-15-2013, 09:28 PM)Sant Anselmo Wrote:
(04-15-2013, 09:19 PM)Whitey Wrote: Did you post in Back fence intentionally ?

Yep.  I didn't think it was a good fit for TC forum and since it wasn't really a news report, I didn't know where else to put it.  People seem to find things regardless of where they end up.  Since the Back Fence is supposed to be "Topics of a more serious nature that don't belong in another forum" that has become my go to spot when I something doesn't seem to really fit anywhere else.   

Ok. Reason I asked is I've had posts moved there in the past and they got few replies. Your's is getting some play though.
Reply
#18
(04-15-2013, 09:35 PM)Whitey Wrote:
(04-15-2013, 09:28 PM)Sant Anselmo Wrote:
(04-15-2013, 09:19 PM)Whitey Wrote: Did you post in Back fence intentionally ?

Yep.  I didn't think it was a good fit for TC forum and since it wasn't really a news report, I didn't know where else to put it.  People seem to find things regardless of where they end up.  Since the Back Fence is supposed to be "Topics of a more serious nature that don't belong in another forum" that has become my go to spot when I something doesn't seem to really fit anywhere else.   

Ok. Reason I asked is I've had posts moved there in the past and they got few replies. Your's is getting some play though.

I've noticed that as well.  I linked to it from the other thread going about whether V2 is infallible or not, which went quite a few posts so I figured some might show up eventually. 

Frustrating when you think you have a great thread topic and no one bites isn't it? :grin:
Reply
#19
(04-15-2013, 09:52 PM)Sant Anselmo Wrote: Frustrating when you think you have a great thread topic and no one bites isn't it? :grin:

Yes it is.
Reply
#20
(04-15-2013, 08:03 PM)TS Aquinas Wrote: Another at http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=776286


That'll get silenced real fast, the posters are using the forbidden L word. Lefebvre !

## The  NuChurch Vatican & Papacy owes that man one he** of an apology - him especially,  though certainly not him alone. Basically, what the Cardinal is saying amounts to an admission that the faithful have been deceived & lied to, on a gigantic scale, for many years. And they want a New Evangelisation - how deluded is that ?  These people have already had their NuPentecost, AKA Babel Restored, courtesy of J23 - apparently the Church has not been devastated enough.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)