Vatican II in error
#56
(08-06-2013, 05:39 PM)The Tax Collector Wrote:
(08-06-2013, 04:33 PM)Melchior Wrote: "According to Article 48 of the Apostolic Constitution on the Roman Curia, Pastor Bonus, promulgated by Pope John Paul II on June 28, 1988: "The proper duty of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is to promote and safeguard the doctrine on faith and morals in the whole Catholic world; so it has competence in things that touch this matter in any way."

Seems like a solid group to follow.  But apparently it's easier to believe in fake Sr. Lucia's than to believe the group that is supposed to safeguard doctrine.


In 1984, an interview with Ratzinger, then the Head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was published in the Pauline Sisters newsletter which stated that the message deals with "dangers threatening the faith and the life of the Christian and therefore of the world", while stating that it marks the beginning of the end-times.   In the year 2000, following the release of the text of the prophecy, Ratzinger issued a statement that the third and final chapter of Mary's prophecy had been fulfilled in 1981 in a failed attempt on Pope John Paul's life. He was quoted in the media as stating, "No great mystery is revealed; nor is the future unveiled. A careful reading of the text will probably prove disappointing."

Sounds like a solid group to follow indeed.

Wait, is it me or is the timing (dates) there off?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-05-2013, 06:11 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Beardly - 08-05-2013, 07:16 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Maldon - 08-05-2013, 07:49 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-05-2013, 07:56 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by guacamole - 08-05-2013, 08:01 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Juanthetuba - 08-05-2013, 09:58 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by The Tax Collector - 08-06-2013, 12:28 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Sant Anselmo - 08-06-2013, 12:54 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Melchior - 08-06-2013, 01:04 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by PurposefulMother - 08-06-2013, 01:51 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DustinsDad - 08-06-2013, 01:59 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DustinsDad - 08-06-2013, 02:14 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Basilios - 08-06-2013, 02:55 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by tradne4163 - 08-06-2013, 04:50 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 07:48 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by lumine - 08-06-2013, 08:06 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 08:21 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by The Tax Collector - 08-06-2013, 08:50 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 09:02 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DeoGratias72 - 08-06-2013, 09:46 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 10:20 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DeoGratias72 - 08-06-2013, 10:22 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by fatiam13 - 08-06-2013, 10:43 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 10:58 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Melchior - 08-06-2013, 11:00 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 11:00 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 11:11 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Miriam_M - 08-06-2013, 11:12 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 11:15 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Armor of Light - 08-06-2013, 11:31 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 11:35 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by The Tax Collector - 08-06-2013, 11:50 AM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Militaris Christi - 08-06-2013, 12:01 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 12:04 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DeoGratias72 - 08-06-2013, 12:11 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Melchior - 08-06-2013, 12:32 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 12:37 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Basilios - 08-06-2013, 12:47 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by guacamole - 08-06-2013, 12:49 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Melchior - 08-06-2013, 12:51 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Basilios - 08-06-2013, 12:51 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 12:54 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by guacamole - 08-06-2013, 12:54 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by guacamole - 08-06-2013, 12:56 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 01:21 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DustinsDad - 08-06-2013, 01:32 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by The Tax Collector - 08-06-2013, 01:39 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DustinsDad - 08-06-2013, 01:51 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 03:36 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 04:29 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Melchior - 08-06-2013, 04:33 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 05:10 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 05:19 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by The Tax Collector - 08-06-2013, 05:39 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by DustinsDad - 08-06-2013, 05:48 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 05:49 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by Tim - 08-06-2013, 05:55 PM
Re: Vatican II in error - by 2Vermont - 08-06-2013, 05:59 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)