Peter the Roman?
#19
(11-16-2013, 11:34 PM)Gabriel Serafin Wrote:
(11-16-2013, 09:53 PM)Armor of Light Wrote:
(11-16-2013, 07:48 PM)triumphguy Wrote: In my opinion relying on prophecies like this is no different from relying on horoscopes: they are a futile way to try and "control" what's going on.

EVEN IF TRUE. 

Which they ain't!

I'm with you on this one TG..

Smacks of divination.
One small step away from being a 'seer' at Medjugoogoo.


As for "Medjugoogoo," the reality is that the Church has not decided one way or another on the matter. Now then; what happens if the Church were to find that the events at Medjugorge are worthy of the faithful to believe, as it did with the events at Fatima? Obviously people would be free to not believe; though a stamp of approval by the Church would put Medjugorge in a whole different light. As for the so-called seers of Medjugorge, they are either all in cahoots over the past 30 years in the greatest hoax in history, or it is a Satanic deception. But why would Satan call on millions to repent, to go to confession, and to pray the Rosary?

Medjugorje supporters want us to think the Church is neutral  but the 1991 statement of the episcopal conference of Yugoslavia states flatly : "on the basis of the research that has been done it is not possible to state that there were apparitions or supernatural revelations". The Church has never approved an ongoing apparition and that is not going to happen now. You wonder why Satan would call people "to repent, to go to confession, and to pray the Rosary?" Remember those are the chief characteristics of every bogus apparition in the last 50 years including, Necedah, Bayside, etc. It's quite a list really. The demons want confusion in the church and what better way is there? Do not forget the wise words quoted by Leo XIII in Satis cognitum: "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition".

C.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Peter the Roman? - by Gabriel Serafin - 11-14-2013, 05:42 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by PolishTrad - 11-14-2013, 06:30 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Tim - 11-14-2013, 07:23 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by PolishTrad - 11-14-2013, 07:28 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Maldon - 11-14-2013, 09:08 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Gabriel Serafin - 11-16-2013, 06:33 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by PolishTrad - 11-16-2013, 07:18 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by triumphguy - 11-16-2013, 07:48 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Chestertonian - 11-16-2013, 07:57 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Tim - 11-16-2013, 08:01 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Clare Brigid - 11-16-2013, 08:08 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Cetil - 11-16-2013, 09:38 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Gabriel Serafin - 11-16-2013, 09:48 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Armor of Light - 11-16-2013, 09:53 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Gabriel Serafin - 11-16-2013, 11:34 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by PolishTrad - 11-17-2013, 06:29 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Tim - 11-17-2013, 09:27 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Gabriel Serafin - 11-17-2013, 04:30 PM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Cetil - 11-19-2013, 07:57 AM
Re: Peter the Roman? - by Tim - 11-19-2013, 10:01 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)