National Catholic Register Deletes Article Urging Pope to Reconcile With SSPX
#1
Here's a link to Rorate's observations about the article that were made before it was deleted.  An update after the deletion is at the bottom of the page:  http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2014/02...s-you.html

Here's the deleted article:
http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/20...unity.html

Pope Francis and the SSPX: An Opportunity
By PATRICK ARCHBOLD

By now, many of you have probably seen the Tony Palmer video last week that was so exciting to many.

At a Protestant conference, Tony Palmer, an Anglican priest, brought along an iPhone video of greeting from Pope Francis. The subject of the presentation and of the Pope’s recording was unity of Christians.

In his remarks, Pope Francis made the following statements to our separated brethren regarding the separation: “Separated because, it’s sin that has separated us, all our sins. The misunderstandings throughout history. It has been a long road of sins that we all shared in. Who is to blame? We all share the blame. We have all sinned. There is only one blameless, the Lord.”

It is certainly true. Regardless of the truth of Catholic doctrine, the Church has accepted its share of the blame for the misunderstanding that were allowed to deepen and harden, leading to centuries of separation.

When I heard this, something else written by Pope Francis’ predecessor came immediately to mind. In 2007, along with the issuance of the “motu proprio” Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict XVI issued a letter explaining his reasoning. In that letter, he made the following statement.

Looking back over the past, to the divisions which in the course of the centuries have rent the body of Christ, one continually has the impression that, at critical moments when divisions were coming about, not enough was done by the Church’s leaders to maintain or regain reconciliation and unity. One has the impression that omissions on the part of the Church have had their share of blame for the fact that these divisions were able to harden. This glance at the past imposes an obligation on us today: to make every effort to unable for all those who truly desire unity to remain in that unity or to attain it anew. I think of a sentence in the Second Letter to the Corinthians, where Paul writes: “Our mouth is open to you, Corinthians; our heart is wide. You are not restricted by us, but you are restricted in your own affections. In return … widen your hearts also!” (2 Corinthians 6:11-13). Paul was certainly speaking in another context, but his exhortation can and must touch us too, precisely on this subject. Let us generously open our hearts and make room for everything that the faith itself allows.
It strikes me that this may be one of those critical moments in history to which His Holiness refers.

With the breakdown of discussion between the Holy See and the Society of St. Pius X at the end of the previous pontificate, the public mood during this first year of the current pontificate, and other internal events, traditional Catholics, both inside and outside the Church, have felt increasingly marginalized. Whether fair or true, I say without fear of contradiction that this is a prevailing sentiment.

This perception of marginalization has manifested itself in increasingly strident and frankly disrespectful rhetoric on the part of some traditionalists and their leaders.

I have great concern that without the all the generosity that faith allows by the leaders of the Church, that this separation, this wound on the Church, will become permanent. In fact, without such generosity, I fully expect it. Such permanent separation and feeling of marginalization will likely separate more souls than just those currently associated with the SSPX.

I have also come to believe that Pope Francis’ is exactly the right Pope to do it. In his address to the evangelicals, he makes clear his real concern for unity.

So here is what I am asking. I ask the Pope to apply that wide generosity to the SSPX and to normalize relations and their standing within the Church. I am asking the Pope to do this even without the total agreement on the Second Vatican Council. Whatever their disagreements, surely this can be worked out over time with the SSPX firmly implanted in the Church. I think that the Church needs to be more generous toward unity than to insist upon dogmatic adherence to the interpretation of a non-dogmatic council. The issues are real, but they must be worked out with our brothers at home and not with a locked door.

Further, Pope Francis’ commitment to the aims of the Second Vatican Council is unquestioned. Were he to be generous in such a way, nobody would ever interpret it to be a rejection of the Council. How could it be? This perception may not have been the case in the last pontificate. Pope Francis is uniquely suited to this magnanimous moment.

I believe this generosity is warranted and standard practice in the Church. We do not insist on religious orders that may have strayed even further in the other direction sign a copy of Pascendi Dominici Gregis before they can be called Catholic again. So please let us not insist on the corollary for the SSPX. Must we insist on more for a group that doctrinally would not have raised an eyebrow a mere fifty years ago? I pray not.

Give them canonical status and organizational structure that will protect them. Bring them home, for their sake and the sake of countless other souls. I truly believe that such generosity will be repaid seven-fold. Pope Benedict has done so much of the heavy lifting already, all that is required is just a little more.

Please Holy Father, let us not let this moment pass and this rift grow into a chasm. Make this generous offer and save the Church from further division. Do this so that none of your successors will ever say, “If only we had done more.”
Reply
#2
Bye Bye NCRegister. I'll take my business elsewhere.
Reply
#3
I'm sure the SSPX wouldn't return under this regime, if they didn't under Benedict
Reply
#4
I can't understand why Neo-Catholics hate traditional Catholicism so much. They're always firing accusations of schism, anti-Semitism or something else. Suggest that there is something wrong with communion in the hand and they get very upset.
Reply
#5
(02-26-2014, 12:22 AM)ThomasTheDoubter Wrote: I can't understand why Neo-Catholics hate traditional Catholicism so much. They're always firing accusations of schism, anti-Semitism or something else. Suggest that there is something wrong with communion in the hand and they get very upset.

Probably because there's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH IT! Gah! There's something wrong when a Catholic denies the True Presence. There is nothing wrong with a Catholic receiving in the hand standing up, saying "Amen," and consuming the host.
Reply
#6
Does communion is the hand give people the idea that they are receiving the Lord of the Universe?
Reply
#7
(02-26-2014, 12:36 AM)ThomasTheDoubter Wrote: Does communion is the hand give people the idea that they are receiving the Lord of the Universe?

Does communion on the tongue? Being fed doesn't necessarily = awesomely holy thing entering my mouth. They both require appropriate catechesis.
Reply
#8
(02-26-2014, 12:25 AM)loggats Wrote:
(02-26-2014, 12:22 AM)ThomasTheDoubter Wrote: I can't understand why Neo-Catholics hate traditional Catholicism so much. They're always firing accusations of schism, anti-Semitism or something else. Suggest that there is something wrong with communion in the hand and they get very upset.

Probably because there's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH IT! Gah! There's something wrong when a Catholic denies the True Presence. There is nothing wrong with a Catholic receiving in the hand standing up, saying "Amen," and consuming the host.

I beg to differ here. While there may be nothing wrong with it in itself, it -- as contrasted with the now-traditional way of receiving -- it does lead to sacrilege way too easily.  IMO, the Church instituded Communion on the Tongue for good reason. Anything that can be done to buttress the idea of the Real Presence -- and which is in keeping with good taste, is in line with Historical practice, etc. --  is a good idea.
 
Reply
#9
(02-26-2014, 12:38 AM)loggats Wrote:
(02-26-2014, 12:36 AM)ThomasTheDoubter Wrote: Does communion is the hand give people the idea that they are receiving the Lord of the Universe?

Does communion on the tongue? Being fed doesn't necessarily = awesomely holy thing entering my mouth. They both require appropriate catechesis.
Our Lord's words illustrate that it does. Please read Matthew chapter 18.
Reply
#10
Does this mean that the National Catholic Register is joining the ranks of the Resistance?
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)