«Natural Law & Sexual Ethics» @ Princeton, by Prof. Ed Feser
#35
(07-09-2015, 01:13 AM)Guingamp Wrote: The arguments were also that it would be impossible to see the final cause of sexuality. The existence and perceptibility of final causes would be open to question. I asked if the final cause of the eyes would really be uncertain. The professor answered that for example the final cause of the mouth would be speaking but that means that a trappist monk would be a sinner because he does not use his mouth to speak.  :eyeroll:
It is not easy to argue against suchs arguments.

Actually, Feser does an excellent job of answering these questions in his article entitled, In Defense of the Perverted Faculty Argument.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: «Natural Law & Sexual Ethics» @ Princeton, by Prof. Ed Feser - by Papist - 07-09-2015, 11:54 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)