Philosophical consideration of Eucharistic Consecration
(03-14-2017, 09:18 PM)yablabo Wrote:
(03-13-2017, 09:51 PM)In His Love Wrote:
(03-13-2017, 09:21 PM)yablabo Wrote: Blood is not valid matter for a baptism, regardless of circumstance or intention.
Yes it is.

"[Saint] Emerentiana, a Roman virgin and the foster-sister of the blessed Agnes, while she was still a Catechumen, burning with faith and charity, rebuked the idol-worshippers who were full of fury against the Christians, whereupon a mob assembled and stoned her. Praying in her torment at the grave of Saint Agnes, and having been baptized in her own blood, so generously shed for Christ, she gave up her soul unto God."

Your comment is an example of a logical fallacy; it's a change in supposition.  We're discussing sacraments, not analogous terms.
I'm not sure if you're a Feeneyite or if I'm misunderstanding your position. I just wanted to clarify, in case it's the former, that blood will work for Baptism depending on the situation. Water is the ordinary means.

Messages In This Thread
Re: Philosophical consideration of Eucharistic Consecration - by In His Love - 03-14-2017, 10:06 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)