REPORT: Women Deaconesses Coming in November
This can't be good for our Church if they go through with it. It'd be a last straw for me, so I hope it isn't true or not carried out.

REPORT: Women Deaconesses Coming in November

Loosely translated from the original Italian

Drafts Part III: the big "renovations" of Bergoglio "Fra CristoforoI'll tell you a story. Last Thursday, in one of the Bar present in front of the Porta S. Anna (front of the Vatican State), go out for coffee a Monsignor (very near Bergoglio), in his fifties, and a layman.

The discussion falls on "dubia". The Monsignor, with making "sufficient" says: "The Pope will never answer to" dubia "of the 4 cardinal. She will never fall to their level. Francis has much bigger projects, which do not stop Italy. The only hitch in this period was the election of Trump ".

To the layman he responded: "And what does Trump with the Amoris Laetitia?". "Got to do and how," he replied the Monsignor, continuing: "The intent was to support the Clinton because with Francesco have a special relationship. Often they feel. And the goal to be reached was that the Catholic Church should have some clear principles of "non-negotiable", so soft, so that even the Vatican had a strong global political support, which in this time of need, especially for large maneuvers that will come. "On this we must give an account to the great Assange..leggete here

The increasingly secular amazed: "And such maneuvers must arrive"? The Monsignor sips the last drop of coffee and says, "but you have not yet realized that the vision that you have of the Church is outdated? Do not you understand that the Pope today is a world leader? That if he stayed Ratzinger we all failed. Do you know what the next maneuver? Just the diaconate to women. Because it is the only way to show our concrete closeness to the Lutherans and Anglicans. And you'll see that by November we will also have the diaconate to women. Maybe not equal to what you think. But it will approach a lot. " "WITHIN November".Here it is. So. Papal Papal what was said by Monsignor of S.d.S. (Secretary of State), in a "state" confidential.

Now we pause to reflect.

Piazza San Pietro is almost always empty (and TV in 2000 still frames that group of people massed in front of the window). What does it matter to Bergoglio of the faithful? From the content of this conversation it shows that the Argentine has far broader evangelization projects. Often he said that evangelization is a form of proselytism that is not good. Recently also he said that he cares if some congregations there are many vocations.Here it is. He seeks only himself. Try to concentrate on if the spotlight, and not step on the streets to anyone because he is the LEADER. And of Jesus Christ it does not matter a damn. Other than St. Paul. The Apostle of the Gentiles said "We are considered the garbage of the world" (1 Cor 4.9 to 13). Just because he put evangelization first. Instead Bergoglio at the expense of Christ and the salvation of souls, you want him in the first place.

Dear readers, this is the reality. And this week there will be more terrifying news. But I leave the earlier press releases.The sense of my anonymity is just that. I am a priest, but I HAVE to stay anonymous. Otherwise I would not have any chance to write these things. I've thought a lot in recent months. But still I can not "come out" publicly. However, I consider important that the faithful "know" the dynamics that evolve in the See of Peter. And these discussions as "bar" for me are extremely relevant. And in conscience, to communicate.Fr. Cristoforo
There were non-ordained (this is important) women deacons in the early Church, I found out recently. But with all the angry feminists who want to be priests, I think this is a dangerous step to re-introduce it so far down the road.

"Because it is the only way to show our concrete closeness to the Lutherans and Anglicans."

We don't have to show our 'concrete closeness' (and how close are we, really? They don't accept the Papal teachings, many of the Marian teachings, the Eucharistic teachings...) to Lutherans or Anglicans. True ecumenism would be to tell them they are separated from the Church (outside of which there is no salvation) and need to enter in to save their souls.
If this happens, I'm gone in a minute! I went through this same circus in Anglicanism 40+ years ago. The whole 'there were deaconesses in the Early Church', 'don't worry, there are no plans for womyn priests', etc., etc. I left shortly after 'womyn deacons' were approved. I had a friend who tried to convince me that there was nothing to worry about. A few years later, when 'priestesses' had been approved and the battle was over 'bishopesses' (and see where it is now in Anglicanism!), I ran into him. Before I could say anything, he said, 'I know! You told me so.' He had also left Anglicanism by that time.
"Pope Francis named just one woman from the Western Hemisphere to his commission on women deacons.

That would be me."

More here:

Notice the source: National Catholic Reporter.

The liberals and the dissenters can all too easily co-opt this Pope for their own causes, unfortunately.

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)