01-13-2021, 11:46 AM
I purchased this believing it to be an historical account that could be used as a reliable reference for honest intellectual debate.
Instead what I got was a poorly written polemic that reads like it was written by a disgruntled ex-employee bashing a former employer who sacked him.
I got as far as the first thirty pages that were chocker-block full of errors, fabrications, broad mental reservations and falsehoods. After that, there was little point in continuing since I could not trust anything that was being said.
If I didn't know better, I would think the book was co-authored by Jack Chick. If you see someone referencing this book as some kind of authoritative discussion, be very suspicious of their scholastic aptitude.
Instead what I got was a poorly written polemic that reads like it was written by a disgruntled ex-employee bashing a former employer who sacked him.
I got as far as the first thirty pages that were chocker-block full of errors, fabrications, broad mental reservations and falsehoods. After that, there was little point in continuing since I could not trust anything that was being said.
If I didn't know better, I would think the book was co-authored by Jack Chick. If you see someone referencing this book as some kind of authoritative discussion, be very suspicious of their scholastic aptitude.