The Gender Bending War Against the Creator
#1
The patron demon of our age is the Baphoment.

via akaCatholic:

Quote:The Gender Bending War Against the Creator

[Image: Levine-1024x512.jpg]
Richard Levine, MD, (alias, “Dr. Rachel”) did his residency in pediatrics, as well as a fellowship in adolescent medicine, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York.

And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)

“Oh, really?” respond the minions of Satan. “We’ll show you who’s in charge!”

In our day, the lines between male and female are deliberately being blurred by those on the “enlightened” left, and make no mistake, it constitutes a direct attack, not primarily against man, but against He to whose image the sexes are created.

Declaring human autonomy over and against the will of God is the entire point of the transgender movement, even if a preponderance of the rank-and-file proponents of this rebellion are too self-absorbed to recognize it as such.

The offenses launched in this war by godless men against their Creator are at times subtle and, in other instances, staggeringly bold. Among the latter is an Executive Order that was signed on January 20 by Joe Biden, a man who dubiously identifies himself as a Catholic.

The text of the Order states, among other things:
Quote:Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports …  All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.
USA Today, an apologist for, and propaganda arm of, the godless left, reached out to the White House for clarification and was pleased to report:
Quote:The order mandates that all students, including transgender students, be able to learn without facing sex discrimination, and as part of that, transgender women [that is, males who merely declare themselves to be female] should compete on female teams, according to the [White House] statement.
In other words, be prepared to see pre-teen and adolescent boys, some of them in make-up, squaring off in athletic competition against much slighter girls and young ladies at a school near you.
[Image: Tranny-Assault1-300x225.jpg]
[i]What happened to the young woman on the right? She was beaten in a Mixed Martial Arts competition by the man on the left, a so-called “transgender.” She was pummeled so badly, in fact, that she suffered a concussion, her orbital bone was crushed, and she needed multiple staples to close a gaping gash on her head.[/i] #LiberalJustice

Though most liberals are applauding Biden’s commitment to LGBTQ “justice” now, this writer can hardly wait for the day when the precious little 85-pound daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Democrat has her ponytail knocked into next Tuesday while playing high school field hockey against a 220-pound boy who calls himself Crystal.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’ll feel just terrible for both of these kids when that happens, but this would be an example of the sins of the fathers being visited upon the children (Numbers 14:18), and far be it for me to protest God’s perfect justice.

NB: While some may be compelled to focus their disgust upon the likes of “Crystal,” gender-confused children deserve our deepest sympathy as there can little doubt that they are the product of an abusive upbringing at the hands of godless parents. For a stunning, real world example of this form of child abuse, by proud Democrat operatives no less, see HERE.

USA Today, being the leftwing mouthpiece that it is, couldn’t help but inject a few lies into their coverage of the situation as well, reporting:
Quote:It is false to say any educational institution that receives federal funding must add biologically male athletes to [female sports] teams.
Newsweek and other outlets made a similar claim in “Fact [sic] Checks” of their own (all of which seem to have originated from the very same source), but there is very little room for doubt as the Executive Order is tied, among other things, directly to “Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” which plainly states:
Quote:Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices. Title IX applies, with a few specific exceptions, to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities. [Emphasis added]
Well, guess what? Prohibiting males who merely call themselves female from participating in girls’ sports isn’t one of those “specific exceptions;” so, you can be certain that any school that does so will soon find its federal funding in jeopardy.

In another finger-in-the-eye of God gesture, Biden also appointed Richard Levine – the drag queen in the photo above who chose to focus on children and adolescents as his “specialties” – as Assistant U.S. Secretary for Health.

At this, let’s turn to some of the more subtle attacks that are being launched against the God who created us male and female.

A few nights ago, I was watching an episode of a home renovation show on television that was following a young couple preparing for the birth of their first child.

“We’re pregnant!” the woman exclaimed into the camera as her husband sat there grinning like a simpleton.

No, sorry lady, you plural are not pregnant; only you are and quite singularly so.

Like I said, subtle, but a blurring of the lines between genders it is, nonetheless.

In fact, we’re pregnant! is so subtle, that one suspects that the majority of those who so speak do so mindlessly; i.e., it is very likely that they’ve never stopped to consider just how absurd the expression truly is, much less how they came to adopt it in the first place. If asked, I suppose they’d insist that it’s harmless and cute, but it is precisely the stealthiness of this sort of linguistic manipulation that makes it so dangerous; it furtively influences the manner in which people think without them even knowing it.

One can well imagine this same woman also saying, as many other newly pregnant women most certainly have, “We are going to become parents!”

Sure, that expression also sounds harmless, but the truth is she would be wrong once again, and the implication here – namely, that the unborn child in her womb is something other than, and presumably less than, their actual child – is even more disturbing. The evil that has resulted from this manner of thinking is obvious, with tens of millions of such children being slaughtered globally via abortion every year.

The reality of the matter is this: Even though it took some time before they would realize it, this young couple had become parents at the very moment of their child’s conception. Recall what Elizabeth said to her pregnant cousin, Mary, at the Visitation:

And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? (Luke 1:43)

The birth of Christ had yet to take place, and the Blessed Virgin was already a mother!

What’s more, upon discovering that a woman is pregnant with a couple’s first child, the present objective reality of parenthood immediately begins exerting its influence as each one very quickly begins carrying out many of the activities that are proper to their unique individual roles as father and mother.

As with any newly pregnant mom, one can easily imagine that the young woman in that television program immediately assumed primary responsibility for nurturing their child, seeing to it that she ate, rested and exercised in such a way as to ensure the child’s growth, health and well-being.

One can also well imagine that the father, for his part, immediately doubled down (literally!) on his role as the protector and provider of his family, making sure that both his wife and his child have adequate shelter (in this case, including home renovations), are safe and sound, and have everything necessary to flourish.

Not that many years ago, complimentary, God-given truths as simple as male and female, father and mother, just went without say; pretty much everyone understood them and embraced them for the gifts that they are.

Today, it’s another story as a sizable portion of humankind has openly declared war against their Creator.

Let us pray for their conversion, indeed, but in the meantime, let us not fail, in light of the sheer havoc they are wreaking upon the inhabitants of earth, to repeat after the Psalmist who wrote:

For there is no truth in their mouth; their heart is vain. Their throat is an open sepulchre: they dealt deceitfully with their tongues: judge them, O God. Let them fall from their devices: according to the multitude of their wickedness cast them out: for they have provoked thee, O Lord. (Psalms 5:9-10)
"The Heart of Jesus is closer to you when you suffer, than when you are full of joy." - St. Margaret Mary Alacoque

Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation. - Ps. 145:2-3

"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables." - 2 Timothy 4:3-4
[-] The following 1 user Likes Augustinian's post:
  • ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident
Reply
#2
(02-08-2021, 07:26 PM)Augustinian Wrote: The patron demon of our age is the Baphoment.

That dude's name is actually Richard, but whatever floats your boat.
[-] The following 3 users Like ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident's post:
  • Augustinian, karl, The Tax Collector
Reply
#3
(02-08-2021, 07:51 PM)ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident Wrote:
(02-08-2021, 07:26 PM)Augustinian Wrote: The patron demon of our age is the Baphoment.

That dude's name is actually Richard, but whatever floats your boat.

[Image: tenor.gif]
"The Heart of Jesus is closer to you when you suffer, than when you are full of joy." - St. Margaret Mary Alacoque

Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation. - Ps. 145:2-3

"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables." - 2 Timothy 4:3-4
[-] The following 2 users Like Augustinian's post:
  • ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident, The Tax Collector
Reply
#4
If you have a materialist world view why would you have any problem with rejecting gender or reject conforming to gender norms?  This shouldn't be surprising.  It's the same reason people are able to justify abortion, they reject the concept of essences.  Honestly, it should be more horrific that abortion was accepted first.

A lot of the stuff people write reacting to the gender issue seems to ignore that this is the root of the problem.  If we want to see this turn around(which we probably won't) that's the thing that will need to be more seriously defended.

We can complain about these laws all we want (and some may change them for a time), but as long as a materialistic outlook is the default in society laws of this type will stay.
[-] The following 2 users Like MacPasquale's post:
  • Augustinian, ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident
Reply
#5
(02-08-2021, 11:39 PM)MacPasquale Wrote: If you have a materialist world view why would you have any problem with rejecting gender or reject conforming to gender norms?  This shouldn't be surprising.  It's the same reason people are able to justify abortion, they reject the concept of essences.  Honestly, it should be more horrific that abortion was accepted first.

A lot of the stuff people write reacting to the gender issue seems to ignore that this is the root of the problem.  If we want to see this turn around(which we probably won't) that's the thing that will need to be more seriously defended.

We can complain about these laws all we want (and some may change them for a time), but as long as a materialistic outlook is the default in society laws of this type will stay.

I've noted that it stems from a warped conception of the "soul" wherein it is merely the vehicle for the personality and has nothing to do with the material form of the body. The idea of an essence or form being directly connected to the concept of the soul is foreign to these people. It's the exact same line of thought that allows many to fall into the transhumanist camp of "downloading" one's mind to a computer so they can "live" in a virtual reality or inhabit a robotic shell. I would go as far as to say that transgenderism is laying the foundation for transhumanism. Regardless, this warped view of gender identity stems directly from the rejection of essences, as you said.

I have a little more hope that people are realizing the importance of the immaterial. Many have become so disillusioned with the materialism of the 20th century that there is a clear resurgence of "classical Traditionalism" in the vein of true Catholicism, Eastern "Orthodoxy", and Evolan/Guenonian forms of Perennial spiritualism.
"The Heart of Jesus is closer to you when you suffer, than when you are full of joy." - St. Margaret Mary Alacoque

Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation. - Ps. 145:2-3

"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables." - 2 Timothy 4:3-4
[-] The following 1 user Likes Augustinian's post:
  • MacPasquale
Reply
#6
They first managed to change the language Orwellian style to make "gender" replace "sex" in all discussions and laws.

Human beings do not have a gender, that is a dehumanizing philosophy. Human beings have a sex.
--BobCatholic 
Reply
#7
(02-09-2021, 12:30 AM)BobCatholic Wrote: They first managed to change the language Orwellian style to make "gender" replace "sex" in all discussions and laws.

Human beings do not have a gender, that is a dehumanizing philosophy.  Human beings have a sex.
In their defense they're expanding the language so that concepts can be conveyed more clearly in a certain context.  

NEWSPEAK removes words in order to prevent certain concepts from being discussed or even thought about.
Reply
#8
(02-08-2021, 11:55 PM)Augustinian Wrote: I've noted that it stems from a warped conception of the "soul" wherein it is merely the vehicle for the personality and has nothing to do with the material form of the body. The idea of an essence or form being directly connected to the concept of the soul is foreign to these people. It's the exact same line of thought that allows many to fall into the transhumanist camp of "downloading" one's mind to a computer so they can "live" in a virtual reality or inhabit a robotic shell. I would go as far as to say that transgenderism is laying the foundation for transhumanism. Regardless, this warped view of gender identity stems directly from the rejection of essences, as you said.

I have a little more hope that people are realizing the importance of the immaterial. Many have become so disillusioned with the materialism of the 20th century that there is a clear resurgence of "classical Traditionalism" in the vein of true Catholicism, Eastern "Orthodoxy", and Evolan/Guenonian forms of Perennial spiritualism.
I don't think you even need gender theory as a stepping stone to transhumanism(honestly transhumism is probably more palatable for a lot of people, people are still awkward with things related to sex and the like).  As soon as you take a materialist view these things are already implied.  Any hesitancy would be more from an emotional reaction.

Short of a miracle, I don't see this changing either.
[-] The following 2 users Like MacPasquale's post:
  • Augustinian, jovan66102
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)