On the Fetal Testing Angle to the Vax?
#14
(07-11-2021, 02:42 PM)TexasJeep Wrote:
(07-11-2021, 10:55 AM)ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident Wrote:
(07-11-2021, 06:57 AM)TexasJeep Wrote: If the Church's word isn't good enough for you, no sense in looking for other moral or philosophical arguments to support your decision.

Which Church?  Today's Church?  Or the Church in 2004?  Because they say different things.

Saying "the Church's word" regarding an issue on which the faithful may have different opinions and still be called faithful is wrong.

Some teachings require your assent.  Others do not require it.  For instance, there may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia.

There is only One Church.

And the Church does not say that we should take a vaccine.

Churchmen do, and they often are not speaking with anything more than a megaphone.

There is absolutely no aspect of our Faith that demands we undergo any medical procedure. There are plenty of aspects of our Faith that demands we do not undergo particular medical procedures.

The 2004 statement is one which is trying to teach the Church's moral stance on tainted vaccines and provide principles. Pope Francis and other clerics suggesting it is kind to get a jab to help and protect others may be good or bad, but it is not the "Church" speaking. It is a cadre of men speaking.
[-] The following 3 users Like MagisterMusicae's post:
  • ChairmanJoeAintMyPresident, DNJC.org, J Michael
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On the Fetal Testing Angle to the Vax? - by MagisterMusicae - 07-20-2021, 03:21 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)