Posts: 5,917
Threads: 225
Likes Received: 2,199 in 1,027 posts
Likes Given: 1,028
Joined: Mar 2009
I've seen references made to conservative Novus Ordo Catholics. How would you define this? I think I know what this means, but I am interested in your thoughts.
"[I]t is vain to hope to attract souls to God by a bitter zeal." Pope St. Pius X.
"If anyone deludes himself by thinking he is serving God, when he has not learned to control his tongue, the service he gives is vain. If he is to offer service pure and unblemished in the sight of God, who is our Father, he must take care of orphans and widows in their need, and keep himself unstained by the world." James 1:26-27.
Posts: 1,877
Threads: 53
Likes Received: 2,688 in 1,170 posts
Likes Given: 2,347
Joined: Jan 2021
It's just all the people who haven't yet had the chance to fall in love with the TLM.
Oh, and they probably struggle with Americanism and dispute a doctrine or two. But not as egregiously as the libs
Posts: 2,111
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 3,079 in 1,355 posts
Likes Given: 2,045
Joined: Mar 2017
I would probably define it as something like this: a Catholic who accepts Vatican II and the resulting "Novus Ordo" and who does not believe they were a rupture with past teaching.
"For the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries nor innovators, but traditionalists."
- Pope St. Pius X
"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables."
- 2 Timothy 4:3-4
"Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."
- 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
Posts: 2,111
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 3,079 in 1,355 posts
Likes Given: 2,045
Joined: Mar 2017
I'll clarify what I mean by "resulting 'Novus Ordo'" by saying I mean the post-Vatican II magisterial teachings and laws, and the NO sacraments.
"For the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries nor innovators, but traditionalists."
- Pope St. Pius X
"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables."
- 2 Timothy 4:3-4
"Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."
- 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
Posts: 1,730
Threads: 351
Likes Received: 1,552 in 679 posts
Likes Given: 310
Joined: Sep 2017
Country:
(07-19-2021, 08:36 PM)SeekerofChrist Wrote: I would probably define it as something like this: a Catholic who accepts Vatican II and the resulting "Novus Ordo" and who does not believe they were a rupture with past teaching.
SeekerofChrsit, it’s good to see you.
I have to ask: what has brought about such a change in your outlook, if you don’t mind my asking?
I only ask as you had very different perspectives previously.
I’m happy you’re no longer sedevacantist (something I was once, myself), but you seem to have come across something that radically changed your views.
Posts: 2,111
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 3,079 in 1,355 posts
Likes Given: 2,045
Joined: Mar 2017
(07-19-2021, 08:45 PM)FultonFan Wrote: (07-19-2021, 08:36 PM)SeekerofChrist Wrote: I would probably define it as something like this: a Catholic who accepts Vatican II and the resulting "Novus Ordo" and who does not believe they were a rupture with past teaching.
SeekerofChrsit, it’s good to see you.
I have to ask: what has brought about such a change in your outlook, if you don’t mind my asking?
I only ask as you had very different perspectives previously.
I’m happy you’re no longer sedevacantist (something I was once, myself), but you seem to have come across something that radically changed your views.
Back in early February, I mentioned in a thread (to Clare, IIRC) that I would be reexamining the case for sedevacantism. That was really only completed a few days ago, to be honest with you. That's the short version of it. If you'd like a more detailed discussion, please feel free to send me a PM. I don't want to derail Clare's thread nor potentially enter into a debate with others about how I've ended up where I am at.
"For the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries nor innovators, but traditionalists."
- Pope St. Pius X
"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables."
- 2 Timothy 4:3-4
"Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity."
- 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
Posts: 3,478
Threads: 212
Likes Received: 533 in 261 posts
Likes Given: 4,320
Joined: Feb 2006
To use an analogy that probably is less than accurate....
A "conservative Novus Ordo Catholic" would read The Wanderer on a regular basis.
Whereas an average Traditional Catholic would probably read The Remnant or Catholic Family News on a regular basis.
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected." - G. K. Chesterton
Posts: 614
Threads: 32
Likes Received: 658 in 294 posts
Likes Given: 548
Joined: Jan 2015
I'd second seekerofchrist's definition.
I'm not sure if it's really the most helpful term though.
If you were to ask me a couple of years ago I would have said in meant anything from non-sspx/sedevacantist Catholics who were well meaning but ignorant, to modernists who were just a bit more conservative.
It seems like it's used more often as an insult than as an accurate way of describing someone.
Posts: 776
Threads: 49
Likes Received: 798 in 400 posts
Likes Given: 758
Joined: Aug 2018
How about, Catholics who have proven that they don't need to attend Latin Mass to be prayerful, charitable, accept all of the Church's teachings, go to Mass Sundays and Holy Days, embrace the sacraments, can get by just fine without badmouthing the bishops and Holy Father, haven't heard or don't pay attention to Vigano, Taylor Marshall, or other trad celebrities, and are overall more common than many Traditionalists give credit for?
Posts: 3,467
Threads: 156
Likes Received: 4,071 in 2,121 posts
Likes Given: 4,212
Joined: Mar 2019
07-19-2021, 09:57 PM
(07-19-2021, 09:56 PM)LionHippo Wrote: How about, Catholics who have proven that they don't need to attend Latin Mass to be prayerful, charitable, accept all of the Church's teachings, go to Mass Sundays and Holy Days, embrace the sacraments, can get by just fine without badmouthing the bishops and Holy Father, haven't heard or don't pay attention to Vigano, Taylor Marshall, or other trad celebrities, and are overall more common than many Traditionalists give credit for?
Oh, you mean emulating Christ with the help of the Sacraments like Catholics are supposed to? Yeah, that sounds about right.
"The Heart of Jesus is closer to you when you suffer, than when you are full of joy." - St. Margaret Mary Alacoque
Put not your trust in princes: In the children of men, in whom there is no salvation. - Ps. 145:2-3
"For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables." - 2 Timothy 4:3-4
|