Apologia: The Fullness of Christian Truth


``Where the Bishop is, there let the multitude of believers be;
even as where Jesus is, there is the Catholic Church'' Ignatius of Antioch, 1st c. A.D


Chapter Six
Clarification

At this point, some might argue that I have been guilty of what is known as "antiquarianism," or a casting aside of everything in favor of what is more ancient. After all, the exact contents of the Tridentine Mass are not identical to the early liturgies. We now say countless prayers that were not known to the Early Church. Even the Rosary, perhaps the greatest prayer in the Church, was not, at least in its current form, known to the Early Fathers. I reply to this argument in the words of St. Augustine (ca. A.D. 400): "In regard to those observances which we carefully attend and which the whole world keeps, and which derive not from Scripture but from Tradition, we are given to understand that they are recommended and ordained to be kept, either by the Apostles themselves or by plenary councils, the authority of which is quite vital in the Church."1

The Early Fathers did not teach that the Faith entails every action, every word, every custom, and every behavior that is found somewhere in the Apostolic heritage. As Augustine demonstrates, the Early Fathers taught that doctrine, specifically, only consists in those beliefs, "observances," and practices, "which the whole world keeps," either due to the command of unwritten "Tradition" or of Scriptural tradition, and which the Fathers "recommended and ordained to be kept." If the Fathers did not command a certain tradition to be kept, if they did not deem it as being part of the Apostolic tradition, then it is not requisite to recognize it as such. The understanding of doctrine is very simple. If the authorities command something that has always been commanded, teach something to be believed that has always been taught, or define a doctrine that has always been understood in the sense defined, then its authority is "quite vital in the Church." If the Church does not command something to be kept as having always been kept, then it is not, in the teaching of the Early Fathers, part of the necessary deposit of Faith. All of this comes back to the initial premise preached by Pope St. Clement. Everything is based on the words of Christ and on the Holy Ghost's arrival to the Apostles on Pentecost. What they passed on as authoritative is what God established as authoritative. What they did not pass on as authoritative, but only performed without any firm necessity was not established by God as necessary.

There is only one way to know what is, in fact, this necessary Apostolic tradition, containing both disciplines and articles of Faith, which is, namely, to see what the Early Fathers themselves believed was necessary Apostolic tradition. If they always held a belief or discipline to be a written or unwritten doctrine of the Faith, then we know, from the foregoing chapters, that not even the slightest alteration in sense, meaning, or understanding can be admitted in such a doctrine. In the judgment of the Early Fathers, there could never be a Truth that had been given originally, but which had not been handed down as such, as Augustine demonstrates (ca. A.D. 420): "That adversary actually uses testimonies from the apocryphal books which were written under the names of the Apostles Andrew and John! If these books had really been written by them, they would have been received by the Church, which has continued from those times through the most certain successions of bishops to our own times without a break."2 In our own times, we have seen this principle repudiated even by a Pontiff. Pope Paul VI, in replacing the Tridentine Rite with the Novus Ordo, made the famous comment: "More ancient liturgical sources have been discovered and published and at the same time liturgical formulas of the Oriental Church have become better known. Many wish that the riches, both doctrinal and spiritual, might not be hidden in the darkness of libraries, but on the contrary might be brought into the light to illumine and nourish the spirits and souls of Christians." In the first place, not one "more ancient liturgical source" has ever been brought forth in the academic or ecclesiastic communities to demonstrate the greater antiquity of any element in the Novus Ordo Rite. As has been well documented by Protestant and Catholic scholars alike, the only revisions made in the Novus Ordo rite from the Tridentine rite date back only as far as Cranmer's Book of Common Prayer. There is no historical proof of any ancient Church or Early Father having offered the Mass in a manner more consistent with the Novus Ordo rite than with the Tridentine. Nonetheless, if indeed there were, if indeed the comments of Pope Paul VI were not either misinformed or disingenuous rationalizing, there would still be no basis for alteration. As Augustine teaches, if the Apostles and Early Fathers had intended a particular aspect of the Liturgy or any other ecclesiastical practice to be passed on and held fast, they would have passed it on and held it fast or, in the words of Augustine, "if these [practices] had really been [performed] by them, they would have been received by the Church, which has continued from those times through the most certain successions of bishops to our own times without a break."

Furthermore, the corresponding doctrine, that all which has always been held fast and passed down is, without a doubt, Apostolic in origin. According to the Early Fathers, the prescriptions authored by their predecessors in a chain back to the Apostles, is absolutely doctrinal and beyond question. To those who would oppose the authority of the inherited Faith, Augustine responds (ca. A.D. 421):

You are convicted on every side. The numerous testimonies . . . are clearer than daylight. Look what an assembly it is into which I have brought you. Here is Ambrose of Milan. . . . Here too is John of Constantinople [Chrysostom]. . . . here is Basil. . . . Here are others too, whose general agreement is so great that it ought to move you. . . . They were famous in the Catholic Church for their pursuit of sound doctrine. Armed and girded with spiritual weapons, they waged strenuous wars against the heretics; and when they had faithfully completed the labors appointed them, they fell asleep in the lap of peace. . . . [T]he assembly of those saints is no common rabble. They are not only sons but also fathers of the Church.3

Augustine continues this same teaching later in this same work:

Holy and blessed priests, widely renown for their diligence in divine eloquence, Irenaeus, Cyprian, Reticius, Olympius, Hilary, Ambrose, Gregory, Innocent, John Basil, - and . . . Jerome . . . What they found in the Church, they kept; what they learned, they taught; what they received from the Fathers, they handed on to the sons. . . . These men are bishops, learned, grave, holy, and most zealous defenders of the truth against garrulous vanities . . . With such planters, waterers, builders, shepherds, and fosterers, the holy Church grew after the time of the Apostles.4

Christ, the Lord, has passed on to His Church an unquestionable doctrine which invests His disciples with a character beyond reproach insofar as they deliver that doctrine. Irenaeus, Cyprian, Hilary, Ambrose, Gregory, Innocent, John, Basil, Jerome, and all the holy doctors and teachers of the Early Church are not an "assembly" of Truth and wisdom because of their own powers or abilities, nor merely because they are the authorities, but, they become authoritative, powerful, and able because of their "fame" for "pursuing sound doctrine." They become "planters, waterers, builders, shepherds, and fosterers" of the Church because they plant, water, build, shepherd, and foster with the doctrine they "found in the Church" and which "they kept," what they "learned," and which they "taught," what they "received from the Fathers," and which they "handed on to the sons." Thus, whatever they passed on as the Truth of Christ which they received from their predecessors cannot contain anything but complete and pure Truth, just as Christ is complete and pure Truth, and anything they did not pass on as the Truth of Christ, and which, consequently, died out, could not have contained complete and pure Truth, because Christ, who is pure and complete Truth, cannot die out.

Footnotes:
1 St. Augustine of Hippo Letter to Januarius (ca. A.D. 400) 54.1.1
2 St. Augustine Against an Adversary of the Law and the Prophets (ca. A.D. 420) 1.20.39
3 St. Augustine Against Julian (ca. A.D. 421) 1.7.30-31
4 Ibid 2.10.33-37

-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- -6- -7-

Index

Quantcast